Video by Damian, David, and Maya
After this week’s lecture, I decided to take some time to reflect on the first question about how the history of slavery shape the Americas and also on feminism in the Americas at the time. For starters, we constantly see reminders of systemic racism not only in the modern day Americas, but all over theContinue reading “Week 6: Citizenship and Rights in the New Republics”
week 6 lecture (video)
Alec Dawson on scientific racism and citizenship (podcast)
Alec Dawson on the legacies of colonialism (podcast)
Week 3 lecture (video)
Video by Linda and Magalee
The scars of slavery are present and it fact remain deeply gashed into the fabric of North America. For me the most alarming thing is the lack of accountability and reconciliation on the part of many Latin American countries. I’ve … Continue reading
This week we are learning about why liberalism never quite thrived in Latin America, and why perhaps liberal ideals were never fully absorbed and integrated into Latin American cultures and societies. As we learnt last week, the Caudillo revolutionaries had ideologically great ideas for the future of Latin America, included in these were: freedom, equality, …
Continue reading “Post-Revolution Latin America: Race and Acceptance In a ‘New’ Society”
This week’s reading posed an interesting comparison between North and South America. Initially, it seemed as though North America had some version of high ground due to the lack of participation in the slave trade in comparison to southern neighbors. Yet that seemed to be completely unaligned with the history I have learned about the United States. I found it really interesting how race and slavery were so intertwined. The United States created an impossible situation for people of color as their entire identity was based upon the history of slavery. When freed slaves visited Brazil they felt a better sense of equality than at home. I wondered what this actually looked like in practice. What was day to day life like for a person of color in Rio? While both were clearly immoral and abominable in the treatment of people of color it’s quite interesting to try and understand each country in the context of the other.
I also found it interesting to read Latin American feminist accounts. Growing up in the U.S. we frequently read suffrage narratives and responses and I found that they were remarkably similar to these accounts. In particular, I found the idea of poetry to be an interesting addition to debates about female rights. Poetry seems to mean two things, both the poetry that is frequently thought of as women’s education and also the idea that women have a sort of poetic way in which they carry themselves. Interestingly both authors write with an intrinsic poeticness, each piece heavily saturated with metaphor and imagery. Echenique has a more relevant argument, sighting the increase of capitalistic tendencies in society should motivate change for women who are less philosophical and engaged in the physical world instead. Pelliza de Sagasta’s contrasting argument was not what I expected; she argues that subservience is the natural way that women should exist. Unlike Echenique’s piece, she sources older authors like Sinués de Marco, rather than focus on the ways in which Latin American society was rapidly developing.
Race and gender are interesting points of comparison; lost within this is is the overlap. I wanted to hear from women in more marginalized communities if there were documents. Did the fight for racial equality outweigh the fight for gender equality? Or was there forms of resistance in both aspects?
