Blogs

Week 3: The Colonial Experience

Casta Paintings are something I’ve never heard of/seen before but I can say I’m very intrigued. In a social justice class in high school, we touched upon caste systems around the world. I noticed it was typically based on religion, social groups, jobs but rarely race. We went into detail about the racial system in […]

The Colonial Experience

 


I found the readings for this week very thought provoking in terms of rebellion and gender roles. Upon reading the story of Catalina de Erauso, I was convinced that I had just read an amazing rebellion story. Girl, run away at 15, pretending to be a man, killing people including her own brother, and a classic womanizer, convinced me of her being a rebel. I then examined the story more closely, and came to realize that while part of her story was about a rebellious teenager, there’s the other part where she fights as a soldier to push colonialism. Her story is not as black and white as I initially thought, and this is a lesson that I’ve already learned a couple times in this class. While she spends her entire story lying and hiding her identity, she also spends that time serving the state, and perpetuating colonialism. She talks greatly about her battles against the “Indians”, and how she slaughtered many of them, bestowing such honour on her war stories. I’m curious about what she thought of her battles. Did she realize that she was rebelling by being an imposter, while genuinely serving, or did she not really care or notice the irony in her actions?

 

The introduction of casta paintings this week brought on a new insight for me about the racial, social hierarchy that was made up. The most interesting aspect of the paintings to me, was the assumptions that you see being depicted through the paintings. The assumptions made about different types of families based on their racial mix may include: relationships (how close the family is), wealth (what jobs they’re working, how nice their houses are etc.), how they like to express their culture (the clothes they’re wearing), and more. Today, this would be considered a backwards way of thinking for many reasons. First of all, we don’t judge how close a family is based on their race, we judge by how they would interact with each other. Wealth is also something not often judged by race these days, unless you’re looking at wealth from a socio-economic point of view. The casta paintings, so clearly organized in a highest to lowest type manner depict an old, outdated way of thinking about race and families. A question I have regarding this topic of categorization is what do we judge first about a person today? How do we categorize people?


The Colonial Experience

 


I found the readings for this week very thought provoking in terms of rebellion and gender roles. Upon reading the story of Catalina de Erauso, I was convinced that I had just read an amazing rebellion story. Girl, run away at 15, pretending to be a man, killing people including her own brother, and a classic womanizer, convinced me of her being a rebel. I then examined the story more closely, and came to realize that while part of her story was about a rebellious teenager, there’s the other part where she fights as a soldier to push colonialism. Her story is not as black and white as I initially thought, and this is a lesson that I’ve already learned a couple times in this class. While she spends her entire story lying and hiding her identity, she also spends that time serving the state, and perpetuating colonialism. She talks greatly about her battles against the “Indians”, and how she slaughtered many of them, bestowing such honour on her war stories. I’m curious about what she thought of her battles. Did she realize that she was rebelling by being an imposter, while genuinely serving, or did she not really care or notice the irony in her actions?

 

The introduction of casta paintings this week brought on a new insight for me about the racial, social hierarchy that was made up. The most interesting aspect of the paintings to me, was the assumptions that you see being depicted through the paintings. The assumptions made about different types of families based on their racial mix may include: relationships (how close the family is), wealth (what jobs they’re working, how nice their houses are etc.), how they like to express their culture (the clothes they’re wearing), and more. Today, this would be considered a backwards way of thinking for many reasons. First of all, we don’t judge how close a family is based on their race, we judge by how they would interact with each other. Wealth is also something not often judged by race these days, unless you’re looking at wealth from a socio-economic point of view. The casta paintings, so clearly organized in a highest to lowest type manner depict an old, outdated way of thinking about race and families. A question I have regarding this topic of categorization is what do we judge first about a person today? How do we categorize people?