Blogs

This week's readings illustrated the effects of modernization that landed to Latin America slowly and unevenly. While modernization seemingly pushed societies forward by introducing new forms of technology and infrastructure, it only benefitted big cities and the elites, leaving the countryside struggling. Juan Carlos Mariátegui criticizes in "The Problem of the Indian"  the gamonalismo system in Peru, which allowed the European landowners exploit the indigenous people. He proposes that the feudal system should be revoked and the indigenous allowed to own their land. This piece reflects the issues that the people living in rural areas, mostly indigenous encountered even if modernization had begun. Through all of this weeks readings it becomes evident that Latin America had profound admiration towards their North American counterparts, but simultaneously they viewed themselves fundamentally different from them. This is especially highlighted in Daríos poem in which he acknowledges and admires the power of the United States but at the same time he romanticizes the uniqueness of the Latin Americas. 

Finally, I would like to say a couple words about the "La raza cosmica". As thrilled as I was to read about someone arguing against racism, I was quite disappointed. Vasconcelos argued that a mixed race would result in the best outcome, since it would make use of all the best qualities of each race and discard the worst qualities. He thought that this cosmic race would originate in the Latin America, which was so diverse in its nature. Vasconcelos states in his writing: "The theory of ethnic superiority has been simply a means of combat[...]" He believes that scientific eugenics isn't valid science and it should not be applied. However, in my opinion he falls in the same trap by arguing that the "cosmic race" is inherently better than another race, no matter what the "reasons" for this superiority are. 

A similarity which I found between Daríos and Vasconcelos's arguments was that Latin Americans are inherently better because of love. Vasconcelos stated it more clearly that it is due to religiousness and Jesus that their people are capable of such love that would result in a better human race. Similarily, Darío says: "Catholic America, Spanish America, the America where noble Cuauthémoc said: “I am not in a bed of roses”—our America, trembling with hurricanes, trembling with Love: O men with Saxon eyes and barbarous souls, our America lives. And dreams. And loves." Both seem to believe that Latin Americans are better because of love and religion, which their North American counterparts are at lack of. 

Question: What differences can we observe between Latin Americans and North Americans? Do you think religiousness equals love? 

read full post >>

This week's readings illustrated the effects of modernization that landed to Latin America slowly and unevenly. While modernization seemingly pushed societies forward by introducing new forms of technology and infrastructure, it only benefitted big cities and the elites, leaving the countryside struggling. Juan Carlos Mariátegui criticizes in "The Problem of the Indian"  the gamonalismo system in Peru, which allowed the European landowners exploit the indigenous people. He proposes that the feudal system should be revoked and the indigenous allowed to own their land. This piece reflects the issues that the people living in rural areas, mostly indigenous encountered even if modernization had begun. Through all of this weeks readings it becomes evident that Latin America had profound admiration towards their North American counterparts, but simultaneously they viewed themselves fundamentally different from them. This is especially highlighted in Daríos poem in which he acknowledges and admires the power of the United States but at the same time he romanticizes the uniqueness of the Latin Americas. 

Finally, I would like to say a couple words about the "La raza cosmica". As thrilled as I was to read about someone arguing against racism, I was quite disappointed. Vasconcelos argued that a mixed race would result in the best outcome, since it would make use of all the best qualities of each race and discard the worst qualities. He thought that this cosmic race would originate in the Latin America, which was so diverse in its nature. Vasconcelos states in his writing: "The theory of ethnic superiority has been simply a means of combat[...]" He believes that scientific eugenics isn't valid science and it should not be applied. However, in my opinion he falls in the same trap by arguing that the "cosmic race" is inherently better than another race, no matter what the "reasons" for this superiority are. 

A similarity which I found between Daríos and Vasconcelos's arguments was that Latin Americans are inherently better because of love. Vasconcelos stated it more clearly that it is due to religiousness and Jesus that their people are capable of such love that would result in a better human race. Similarily, Darío says: "Catholic America, Spanish America, the America where noble Cuauthémoc said: “I am not in a bed of roses”—our America, trembling with hurricanes, trembling with Love: O men with Saxon eyes and barbarous souls, our America lives. And dreams. And loves." Both seem to believe that Latin Americans are better because of love and religion, which their North American counterparts are at lack of. 

Question: What differences can we observe between Latin Americans and North Americans? Do you think religiousness equals love? 

read full post >>

I would like to focus this week’s blog post on Rubén Dario’s poem titled “To Roosevelt” and the meaning behind it. Even during the “modernization” of Latin America, countries depended on their relationship with the United States to further progress their nations. For an exchange of exporting valuable resources and goods, America would provide up […] read full post >>

In the lecture video for this week, “ Signs of Crisis in a Gilded Age” professor John talked about the... read full post >>

In the lecture video for this week, professor John talked about how modernization in Latin America tended to be superficial, and “trouble was brewing” under the surface. In the article about Diaz by Creelman, we read last week, Mexico seems to be a stable and peaceful region with no crisis in sight. Yet, reading this […] read full post >>

For this blog post I want to talk about Ruben Darío’s, “To Roosevelt”. I loved this poem! In a Spanish class I took last semester, we learned a little bit about Darío when we studied modernism. We learned that he was the founder of modernism, and we also studied in detail one of his poems […] read full post >>

This week’s lecture “Signs of Crisis in a Gilded Age” mainly focuses on the poem “To Roosevelt” (the original Spanish title being “A Roosevelt”) by Nicaraguan poet Rubén Darío, and the differences between Latin America and the United States. For this week’s blog post, I would like to focus on the question “What emotions ofContinue reading "Week 8: Signs of Crisis in a Gilded Age" read full post >>

This week’s topic asked the question: given that modernity and the export boom were coming (in all its superficial, gilded glory), what would be the cost for Latin American countries? One element seems to have been almost a positive feedback loop – new technologies introduced by modernity (railroads, telegraphs) lead to more upheaval in Latin […] read full post >>

The anger and opposition to the United States’ interventionism that is expressed in Rubén Darío’s poem “To Roosevelt” still is... read full post >>

As we have discussed previously, Latin America is an extremely diverse place. This, combined with the residual left by the casta system, leads to a separation of groups; a lack of national solidarity. This has various effects. From last week we learned these barriers resulted in the unequal distribution of modernization/progress, that the benefits ofContinue reading "Week 8: Signs of Crisis in a Gilded Age" read full post >>